Which Edition

Confucius

The Analects

Pick what matters most to you

Compare all 4
Cover of The Analects, translated by Edward Slingerland
Best for most

Edward Slingerland · 2003

Edward Slingerland's Hackett translation is the one I'd start with — accurate and clear, and uniquely it weaves in selections from the traditional Chinese commentaries, so you read the Analects the way Chinese readers always have: with the centuries of interpretation that make the terse sayings cohere. This is where I'd start.

Cover of The Analects, translated by D. C. Lau
The accessible classic

D. C. Lau · 1979

D. C. Lau's Penguin translation is the accessible classic — straightforward, lightly annotated, with helpful appendixes on Confucius and the text. The most commonly read version, and a fine plain introduction.

Cover of The Analects, translated by Simon Leys
Most natural English

Simon Leys · 1997

Simon Leys's Norton translation is the most concise and natural-sounding in English, with thoughtful notes. A lovely reading version if you want elegance over apparatus.

ConfuciusThe Analectstr. James Legge
The free classic

James Legge · 1893

James Legge's 19th-century translation is public domain and free — the Victorian scholar's standard, complete, if formal and dated. Free; fine for reference, with the modern versions easier to absorb.

See the full comparisonCompare all 4 editions side by side — translator, introduction, notes, and format.

Which Edition earns a small commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you — it never changes our picks.